By now I heard it so often that to pursue happiness is a
sure and trusted way to become unhappy. So, the question poppped into my mind
and the minds of the tens of clients seeking help in dealing with their
persistent issues: what shall we do instead?
Being on the look for solutions to this cul-de-sac I
stumbled upon this book, who’s declared purpose is, in the very words of the
author: ”What this book wants to offer, […],
is a methodic, basic introduction- drawn from decades of clinical experience-
into the most useful and reliable mechanisms for the pursuit of unhappiness.”
(Paul Watzlawick- The Situation is Hopeless, but not Serious- The Pursuit of
Unhappiness)
Hmmm... I said to myself while ordering it immediately
from Book Depository (my favorite book store online). Could this be something?
I’ll let you decide, but will give you a teaser sample:
„Of all the knots, tangles, and other booby traps in the
arsenal of an experienced relationship demolition expert (RDE), the ~Be
spontaneous!~ paradox is by far the most universally utilized. And a real
kosher paradox it is satisfying even the most stringent requirements of formal
logic. In the pristine halls of logical Olympus, coercion and spontaneity (i.e. that which proceeds from within
without constraint and external force) are incompatible. To do spontaneously
what one has been commanded to do is just as impossible as to forget by an act
of conscious decision or to deliberately sleep more deeply. Either we act spontaneously,
that is, at our own discretion, or we comply with a command and therefore do not
act spontaneously. From a purely logical point of view we cannot do both at the
same time.
But so what? What do we care about logic?
[...]
It does not seem to make much difference whether we
prescribe the ~Be happy!~paradox to ourselves or whether it is imposed on us by
some outside authority. Furthermore, ~Be happy!~is only one of the many
variations on one basic theme of ~Be spontaneous!~. Virtually any spontaneous behavior lends itself to
the construction of inescapable traps: the demand for spontaneous remembering
or forgetting; the wish for a particular gift and the disappointment when one
receives it „only” because one stated that wish; the attempt to will an erection
or an orgasm, which makes impossible precisely that which it was supposed to
achieve; the resolve to fall asleep because one wants to sleep; or the demand
for love as a moral obligation that leads to the impossibility of loving.”
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu